Growing Up on Fast Food Essay Example for Free

Growing Up on Fast solid intellectual nourishment EssayMost Ameri asseverates imbibe fertiliseen at a ram down-in restaurant, diner and/or fast-flying-food restaurant in their lives. Customers frequent these establishments for its convenience and affordability. Part of the fast-food lure is to satisfy the body a nonher part is a family sitting down and enjoying a repast together.M any(prenominal) lot back in the 1950s and 1960s did not understand food safety and its dangers. Food was cooked in butter or lard instead of Trans oils, veg oil or margarine that be utilise today. Foods in the past were loaded with fat and cholesterol, which do consumers early candidates for cardiovascular diseases, stroke and other health issues. Food may realise tasted delicious, but that came with a heavy price.Consumers of today are more educated concerning the risks and rewards of eating out and how food is prepared. They still nervus similar obstacles as their parents and grandparen ts did generations ago. How is the food made? What ingredients are used in making the selected dish? Is the business office where the food is grown/processed/made reputable? Any of the aforementioned questions that are answered in the prohibit should be cause for concern.Recent examples in the U.S. include the minor recall. In that case, the product was tainted at the manufacturing plant. The items were put out for mass consumption, and that decision lead to many throng getting sick and others dying. The monkey nut Corporation of America (PCA) voluntarily recalled peanuts that were manufactured in either Georgia or Texas for fear that consumers would be exposed to Salmonella poisoning. (FDA, p.1)Although the outbreak did not affect jars or peanut butter commonly found in supermarkets, the tainted supply went to institutions and other establishments. (MSNBC,Fast Food 2p.1) This meant restaurants could study received the contaminated peanut butter. Where hundred of people were injured and a half-dozen people died from Salmonella poisoning, this could have been even more tragic if not for the recall. (1)The news becomes important since many restaurants offer peanut and jelly sandwiches on their kids menu. It is a comfort food for many peoplefor the young and young-at-heart. (Phantom Gourmet, 2009) Having that option taken away would have been tough for restaurant owners who would have removed that item off its menu and the patrons who would have assigned the sandwich. (Phantom Gourmet, 2009)This is where the fast food industry can either be a friend or foe. They offer many choices for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Items range from bacon and bombard in the morning to prime rib in the evening. Many places like diners are open 24 hours, so people can get what they are craving any time. Being able to order what customers want when they want entices people to eat out.Another reason people go out to eat is the restaurants atmosphere. Certainly a fast-food facil ity such as McDonalds will have a different motif than a diner, which will have a more distinctive air than a mom-and-pop restaurant. The Golden Arches typically serves hamburgers, fast sandwiches with French fries and soft drinks. Kids are usually seen play in a designated area. Not a place for people without kids who want to sit down to a quiet meal.The problem comes as a good deal of the food is either fatty to begin with or comes with con diments that are besides high in fat, calories and other things that can expand a waistline or season an artery. Fast food companies are adapting to the way Americans eat by offering salads, parfaits and other healthier choices. McDonalds has spent billions of dollars in advertising these menu changes (McDonalds Corporate, p.1)Fast Food 3Diners have been virtually this country for decades. Most people have one either in or near their town. These establishments offer good food and reasonable prices. That is often not the primary reason pat rons flock to the diner, however. The restaurant pitch up is the main attraction. Some places have rally nights featuring vintage cars and motorcycles from the 1950s and 1960s.Other places house 50s-era memorabilia with photos of vocalizer/Actor Elvis Presley, Actress Marilyn Monroe, Actor James Dean and advertisements for Coke products that were very inexpensive in those days. savor getting a bottle of coke for a nickel todayit will not observe because of the cost of making the item and most companies use plastic instead of glass. There is less of a safety risk involved with plastic and it is cheaper to produce.Then there is the modern convenience of take-out or drive through. Being able to take home a bag from a fast-food place is certainly commodious and one does not mean unloading the family of the car. A menu is set up outside where people can give their orders, drive up to the window, pay the server, get their food and drive off to their following(a) destination.Sounds ea sy in that the food still comes out fast (and correctly, one hopes), but what the experience loses is people enjoying the food. Sure, the family sits in the car eating their hamburgers and French fries, but at the cost of getting the car dirty, having to riffle out the garbage later and being cramped in a car seat without the benefits of reaching or using the restroom if needed.That type of convenience may be too ofttimes for any(prenominal) people. There is no wrong answer to how people dine. Time, the order itself, and other circumstances dictate if and when a person of family sits inside the restaurant, takes it out, or drives through. The bottom line for the restaurants is making sure the food is properly served to its customers so they lapse.Fast Food 4This paper also hopes to debunk the myths surrounding fast food, how people who grew up eating at such places have adapted with the times, and how the restaurant industry has attempted to enlighten its customers active the choices they have.Iconic restaurants such as McDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken (A.K.A. KFC) had a formula for encouraging return visitors. Offer customers good food at reasonable prices and they may come back again and deal friends. Both franchises have been going strong for more than five decades because their philosophy has not changed much during that time. rose-cheeked Does Not Bad TastingOne problem fast food companies had to address is the fictional character of the ingredients used to make their trademark dishes. Is the meat for the burgers made at McDonalds or Burger King the opera hat quality they can find? Are the chickens raised for use at Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) fed a solid diet of nutrients?Those questions and answers matter to a point. Everyone will demonstrate the excellence of their products to show they care c brookly their customers. If they fail, then actions such as recalls (for peanuts as previously mentioned) happen. This puts the industry under ne gative light and those running(a) within the industry must work harder to regain the customers trust. Restaurants that did not have any trouble with the recalled product will be challenged to make their products better or fall behind in the marketplace.McDonalds has been proactive over the past three decades in educating consumers closely their foods and service (McDonalds, p.1). They began printing up nutrition information for their customers to read if they wish. They might not like the fact a Big mack sandwich has 50 percent of the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of saturated fat. (1)Fast Food 5Or, a McRib sandwich has 48 percent of the RDA of saturated fat. (1) Clearly, these are not choices for people looking to either lose weight or remain physically fit. Their nutritional information may be found either by accessing the company website at www.mcdonalds.com or stopping in any one of their restaurants and picking up a brochure.Eating at McDonaldsor any fast food placefor a prolonged period of time can have detrimental consequences. Morgan Spurlock wrote and directed a 2004 film about the fast-food industry, Supersize Me The plot was simple Spurlock would eat nothing but the contents of the McDonalds menu for 30 straightforward days. He had to order everything off the menu at least once and had to supersize his order if asked. He would also refrain from exercising during the one-month period. (Spurlock, p.1)His point was to demonstrate the hazardous effects of eating out at fast food restaurants. Watching the film makes people cringe as he begins to gain too much weight, lose energy in wanting to do any real activities. Because of his McDonalds diet and his lack of exercise, Spurlock not only gained a whopping 24 pounds in 30 days, consumed a pound of scrape a day on average and his cholesterol rose an unbelievable 65 points from when this experiment started. (Spurlock Quotes, p.1) excessively the obvious physical ailments that befell Spurlock durin g his thirty days, there were also the psychological aspects. He said during the movieI nearly doubled my risk of coronary heart disease, making myself twice as likely to have heart failure. I felt depressed and exhausted most of the time, my mood swung on a dime and my sex life was non existent. I craved this food more and more when I ate it, and got monolithic headaches when I didnt. In my finalThe movie was nominated for an Academy Award had had quite the reaction from moviegoers. Although McDonalds officials denied the moved at the time, they scrapped the supersize option several weeks after the movie was released. (Wikipedia, p.1) They also offered its customers healthier alternatives such as salads. Spurlock said those choices contained more sugar than a bag of cookies. (1)Spurlock accomplished what he set out to do find the causes of overweight people in the US and the bigger problem of obesity in this country. McDonalds and the rest of the fast-food industry had to take note that their foods, if taken as much as Spurlock had, would have destroy effects on peoples health and well being. Nobody suggested that families eat every meal at restaurants. That logic would be expensive as well and unhealthy and would not make much sense.His body changed for the worse after his 30-day McDonalds binge. It took five months for Spurlock to lose the weight he gained during that period (Spurlock Quotes, p.1). He suffered from liver damage, high blood pressure and other damaging ailments while performing this experiment. Moderation for anything is the best course of action when attempting to so something. That McDonalds food was not healthy struck a chord, that Spurlock damage his body making a point struck an even louder chord.