Future Energy

time to come nil Have you eer thought about the button providing you electricity for your daily life that atomic position could take you off from this world (it is non clear what you gestate here)? What was your feeling when you watching news about the Fukushima thermo atomic crisis? What do you deliberate when you see how victims of Chernobyl disaster live to meanspirited solar day? Good start the incredulitys atomic number 18 a very profound elan to get your readers attention. ) All of those issues atomic number 18 just because of ace reason the safety problem of nuclear office staff.The question is Can we control it completely? This question is non only for around good deal or nearly groups the /a specific regimen (or governments? as with your other es reads on this topic, be clear about what you mean. Are you cerebration about virtuoso specific government? Governments in general? ) should consider their citizens and, even every single species living on this planet. App arently, round countriesy could non dominate nuclear big businessman so that tragedy was happened and severely touched on millions of people.For this reason, I ideate government (again, be clear one specific government? Governments in general? should exchange nuclear role by alternatives such as solar galvanizing energy ? Is this alleged(a) to be here? generation and wind electric power generation. Sustainabilityle is the or so important index for every type of energy re root system. deal argues that nuclear is the most sustainable energy resource they give up. The fuel of nuclear power live that uranium and plutonium is the precious metals in the nature (? It is non clear what you mean here).But people who clog up nuclear power seems to harbour ignored the fact that the storage of precious metals is very low it has some day that exhaust from the Earth (awkward perhaps volition some day be exhausted from the earth? ). People know that wind energy a nd solar energy all turn out been exploited (this is really the nerve centre of your argument in this dissever, but this part of the sentence is not clear. What do you mean they have been exploited? This sounds like a negative thing, not a positive thing as you argument should suggest. ). The fuel make up of those two energy resources is zero.They are displaceuring energy resources, unless(prenominal) the sun disappears from flip-flop and the Earth stops revolving. Spinning. So for the issue of resources (you started the paragraph with the idea of sustainability. It would be a good idea to end your argument in this paragraph with that as well. ), solar energy (what about wind energy? ) is infract than nuclear power. Other than sustainabilityle, the make up of running and maintaining a nuclear power plant is the important point that people find? interesting. For every power plant, people will spend cash on planning, designing, constructing, running, maintaining it.Every sing le measuring rod in this process will cost amount of money to take for sure the plant will works well. And the cost of materials and cost of aliment is the significant chunk of the whole cost (what is the cost comparison? Do you have some statistics/figures that support your argument here? ). People (who are these people you keep writing about? Do you have some support from experts on this topic that you could bring into your argument? ) are saying that conventional electric plants will cost too often money on materials and maintenance. So they think nuclear power plant is the best plectrum for finance.For nuclear power plant, it will cost only less than a hundred tons of nuclear material for every year nevertheless, the cost of designing and planning a nuclear power plant is much higher than traditional electric plant. It cost huge number of money on safety, but it still does not work well. However, for solar electric energy generation and wind electric power generation, it c osst much less on designing and constructing than nuclear power plants, even none on fuels. I suggest government to calculate the price-performance ratio of setting a plant. O. k.Good suggestion, but what is the cost comparison? How do you know that these differences in cost exist? For every factory or plant, people always focalize on how its productivity is. But the hot potato of pollution is get more necessary (? I am not sure what you mean here). They might think more about how much discharges will it foul up and how to dispose of those discharge more thoroughly. It has been argued that the most important advantage of nuclear power plant is its low discharging. And people who checking this opinion think nuclear power plants are very eco-friendly for environment.They contend that there is no gaseous pollutants discharge from nuclear power plants. But we can not ignore that the nuclear beam from nuclear power plant redundance is much more dangerous than gaseous pollutants tha t very harmful for the gay and the nature. For the human body, when the radiation value get overtakes more thanthe threshold, it will pervert the tissue in the body. People still haves no effective rule to dispose of the Radioactive Nuclear Waste that all this three manner can not restrain the radiation come out (? this is unclear).It will damage the soil and the ocean andthat threatens the other species. Even today, the nuclear radiation from Chernobyl disaster continues to influence on the soil and water. Ukraine has millions of victims affected by this accident. And now, some of them died by cancer, some of them are still living under the swarthiness of the Chernobyl disaster. Nevertheless, there is no problem on discharge of solar electrical energy generation and wind electric power generation. (you need to say more about this give more of a comparison in order to make your argument stronger.So I am highly recommending that government should consider the future of human r ush along. In conclusion, people who support nuclear power strongly are holding strong reasons (have good reasons? So that you dont repeat strong). But it is not worthy for nowadays anymore. People should learn to embrace new technology to replace the old one. The Government should use new energies to make sure peoples life can be proceeding and secure, and human race can be inherit prosperous. As Meador (1978) says There is no way to know absolutely about the future until we make the journey. , say by Meador (1978).This is a great way to end, Mike. Mike You make a number of good points in this essay and you have organized it well. You have all of the elements of a good essay a clear dissertation statement, focused paragraphs with topic sentences and generally good connections between ideas. I have made a number of chit chats throughout your essay, though, of places where improvements are needed. My main comment is that you need to give more specific examples of the statements t hat you make. This means Eliminating your use of They and People to describe those who hold opposite views to yours.These are large generalizations that make it blue-blooded for your reader to question the reality of what you are saying. If there are experts who hold these opinions, then be specific about who they are. Use sources and statistics to back up up your arguments I have noted a number of places where you make some statements that are generalizations. These generalizations make your argument weaker than it could be. However, if you use statistics or confirmed facts to back up your generalizations, that would strengthen your argument.Source You have a source listed at the end of your essay that seems like it might be a good one to support some of your arguments. Why didnt you use more information from this source throughout your essay? Mark 60/100 Reference Meador, Roy. (1978). Future Energy Alternatives. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. 3, 112. This book talks abou t energy crisis and why we need energy alternatives. The book shows several types of alternatives such as solar energy, wind energy, bioenergy, peat, heat pumps, and hydrogen energy. Then it gives what are the benefits of those alternatives.